Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 global score. The Galaxy A70 body is newer and a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X and Samsung Galaxy A70 feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in low-light situations, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.