Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is notably newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's, although it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy F62 shoots greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better video resolution. The Galaxy F62 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a much better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.