Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, so it counts with some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a screen that's very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a lot bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.