Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with an 89 score against 71.8. Although Galaxy Note10 is a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's just a bit thinner and extremely newer. Galaxy Note10 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way larger aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 17 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.