Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a 95.4 score against 71.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen, a larger screen and a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.