Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a global score of 82.6 against 71.8. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is way lighter and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite better pixel number in each inch in the display and a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a way higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.