Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's score of 71.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a really superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra features better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4100mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.