Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Metal | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has an overall score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S4 has older 4.4.2 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy S4 design is just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it was released 4 years before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S4 has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S4 also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
Galaxy S4's camera is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X one, and although the Galaxy S4 has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S4, because it has 32 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S4 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.