Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a general score of 81 against 71.8. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably newer phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but it's notably heavier and thicker.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little higher number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X and Galaxy XCover Pro count with incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.