Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is way better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with an 88.5 score against 71.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy Z Flip body is extremely newer and thinner, but a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite better number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.