Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 145.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a 92.3 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a just a little higher pixels density and a larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 24 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.