Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's, although it's way heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a much bigger display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.