Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a 90.1 score against 71.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger display, a just a little greater display pixels density and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4100mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger aperture, a way better (4K) video definition and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.