Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having a score of 84.2 against 75.8. Although the iPhone XS and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro were released with only a few months difference, the iPhone XS is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The iPhone XS has a better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. IPhone XS has a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, the iPhone XS also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.