Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 75.8. Google Pixel 4a's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, but it's notably lighter. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater pixels density. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Google Pixel 4a captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.