Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 75.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a bit lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, but both have the same thickness. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a little higher pixels density, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture and a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.