Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-22 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's 75.8 global score. The Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer device, and it is also just a bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a little greater screen pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 5 takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a more mega-pixels camera, a way higher (4K) video quality and a much bigger camera aperture.
The Google Pixel 5 has a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 5 has a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.