Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit higher pixel density.
The Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50 takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a way larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A50's battery life is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.