Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-22 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting a general score of 86.6 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is newer, a little bit lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy A50s has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit better display density and a little larger display. The Galaxy A50s has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A50s has a lot better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much better video resolution and a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution. Galaxy A50s has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s's battery lifetime is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.