Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting a global score of 85.5 against 75.8. The Galaxy A51 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy A51 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A51 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a little bit better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot better video definition. Samsung Galaxy A51 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51's battery duration is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.