Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, with a general score of 98 against 75.8. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a a lot newer device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a higher pixel amount in each inch of display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a larger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.