Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-02-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, having a overall score of 95.4 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's, but it's incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a just a bit better screen density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a lot higher video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.