Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2018-02-22 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro's 75.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S25 has a lot better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit better display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy S25's battery lifetime is very similar to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.