Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2018-02-22 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting a 90.7 score against 75.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a little greater pixel density and a little larger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a lot bigger aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.