Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, having a 97.6 score against 74.4. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 has Android 7.1 Nougat, so it gives a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Even though Galaxy Fold is a lot heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, it's somewhat thinner and also newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way larger camera aperture. The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.