Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 77.2. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel is a lot older and a little thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it's design is still way lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit lower pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with more megapixels, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.