Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a score of 80 against 77.2. Even when Google Pixel 3 and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, Google Pixel 3 is just a bit thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little inferior pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a more MP camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.