Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's score of 77.2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Google Pixel 3a body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, even though they were released with only a few months difference.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Google Pixel 3a also has a back facing camera with more mega pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.