Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 score. The Google Pixel 4 construction is newer, lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2280 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also counts with a little bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a better 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.