Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 77.2. The Google Pixel 4a body is newer, a lot lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Google Pixel 4a features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Google Pixel 4a captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Google Pixel 4a also has a lot better (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with more MP and a larger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.