Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is newer, a little thinner and a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a way higher (4K) video definition, a better resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.