Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a general score of 77.2, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is newer than the HTC U Ultra, it's a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores (but slower) and 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro and HTC U Ultra feature really similar displays, because although the HTC U Ultra has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels count in each inch of screen. The HTC U Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the HTC U Ultra also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
HTC U Ultra features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with greater battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.