Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's global score of 77.2. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it is just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a much brighter display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture, a much better video quality, a lot higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.