Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a global score of 77.2 against 75.8. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has 8.1 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is older than the nubia Red Magic 3S, it's body is thinner and lighter.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a much higher video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.