Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's overall score of 77.2. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy A25 5G is a just a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but both of them are 0.33inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display, a really brighter screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A25 5G has better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition, a larger diafragm aperture and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.