Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 general score. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is notably newer and just a little bit thinner, but heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A35 5G has older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little smaller screen, and they both have the same brightness, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also counts with a little better pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy A35 5G shoots way better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a lot higher video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.