Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's score of 77.2. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but it's a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixels number per screen inch, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little smaller screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better resolution back camera and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.