Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's global score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but both are 0.33inches thick. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52, although it has a little smaller screen, a little lower pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.