Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a global score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro design is just a little bit lighter but a little thicker than Galaxy A70, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has 8.1 Oreo version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A70 has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
Galaxy A70 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A70 features just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.