Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is just a little thinner but a little heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and both of them were released with only 0 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments, a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot better video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.