Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.42 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with an 82.6 score against 77.2. The Galaxy S25 construction is way lighter and extremely thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy S25 counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a much brighter screen and a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 features a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a much better video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro and the Galaxy S25 have very similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.