Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.42 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 77.2. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and way more screen brightness.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S25 Ultra has greater battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.