Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a 77.2 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's design is notably newer, somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same brightness, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cpu cores (although slower) and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a 12 MP camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB. Galaxy S7 Active features a battery performance that's very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.