Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 400 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a global score of 80.1 against 77.2. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, although it is way heavier and a lot thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display pixel density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rates, the same sensor size and a camera with a 12 MP resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.