Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with an 81 score against 77.2. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little less pixels per inch of screen, they both have a display with the same size. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller sensor shooting much lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.