Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and thinner phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it is also just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280.
Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a same size sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.