Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a score of 85.6 against 77.2. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is a lot newer and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, although it's also a bit heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower screen density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.