Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, having a 94.6 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's, but it's also extremely heavier. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a way higher (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.