Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a global score of 90.6 against 77.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it's notably thinner and incredibly newer.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 10% larger battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.