Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a, with an 80.3 score against 78.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a, but it's extremely heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3a counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has higher video frame rate, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.